Advisory Services

CSR Compliance for NRI Promoter-Controlled Indian Companies under the Companies Act, 2013

Governance, Board Composition, FCRA and DTAA Considerations for Companies Managed from UAE and Singapore

Sandeep Singla

Sandeep Singla

CSR Compliance for NRI Promoter-Controlled Indian Companies under the Companies Act, 2013

Professional Knowledge Series | CSR │ FEMA │ International Tax

In Brief

An Indian company remains an Indian company and its CSR obligation remains a domestic one, regardless of whether its promoters and directors are Non-Resident Indians based in the UAE or Singapore. The genuine complexity for such companies lies not in the CSR obligation itself, but in the governance mechanics of running a CSR Committee across time zones, and in a small number of specific points where CSR-adjacent capital allocation intersects with FCRA and DTAA considerations.

I. Executive Summary

An increasing number of Indian companies are promoted and managed by Non-Resident Indians based in the UAE and Singapore. These promoters usually visit India occasionally and run the company from overseas. If the company meets the criteria in Section 135(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, it must follow the same CSR rules as any other Indian company. This includes calculating net worth, turnover, and net profit as usual, and spending 2% of the average net profit on Schedule VII activities in India.

This article looks at a related issue: not whether CSR rules apply, but how a company controlled by NRI promoters should manage governance and capital planning under these rules. There are three main points. First, how to form the Board and CSR Committee when some directors are outside India. Second, how to approve the CSR policy and annual spending across different time zones. Third, when fund movements for CSR involve FCRA and the India-UAE or India-Singapore DTAAs, and when they do not.

Before discussing these topics, note that an Indian company's own CSR spending is not a cross-border transaction and does not get DTAA relief. This spending is domestic because the company is an Indian tax resident, regardless of where its promoters live. The real cross-border issues come up when an NRI promoter's personal contributions or overseas entities interact with FCRA, or when dividend repatriation planning under the DTAA affects the company's overall capital allocation, including CSR funds.

II. Legal and Regulatory Background

Section 135(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 applies CSR obligations to "every company" meeting the prescribed thresholds, without reference to the residency of its promoters, directors or shareholders. From that general rule, an Indian company remains an Indian company for this purpose regardless of whether its controlling shareholders are Non-Resident Indians, a materially different position from that of a foreign company under Section 2(42) operating through an Indian branch or project office, which is subject to a distinct applicability and computation regime of its own.

Against that statutory baseline, two further, separate strands of company law bear directly on NRI-promoter-controlled companies. Section 149(3) requires every company without exception to have at least one director who has stayed in India for a total of not less than 182 days during the financial year, a requirement that applies irrespective of that director's citizenship or NRI status. Separately, Section 173(2), read with the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, governs the conduct of Board and committee meetings through video conferencing or other audio-visual means, including which matters, if any, may not be dealt with in this manner.

From there, the cross-border side is distinct. The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) governs the receipt of contributions from a 'foreign source' by persons in India, while the India-UAE and India-Singapore DTAAs govern the withholding tax treatment of dividends and other passive income flowing from an Indian company to its NRI promoters. Neither framework applies to the Indian company's own CSR spend as such, but both are relevant to the broader financial planning that surrounds an NRI-controlled company's capital allocation decisions.

III. Key Provisions — Professional Analysis

3.1 CSR Committee and Board Composition: Resident Versus NRI Directors

At the committee level, the analysis begins with the ordinary composition rules under Section 135(1) and Rule 5 of the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014. For an Indian company, which is distinct from a foreign company operating through a branch or project office, the CSR Committee must have three or more directors, including at least one independent director where the company is required to appoint one, or two or more directors where it is not (including for a private company with only two directors on its Board). There is no NRI-specific carve-out analogous to the two-person structure prescribed for foreign companies; an NRI-promoter-controlled Indian company's CSR Committee is constituted exactly as any other Indian company's would be.

The key residency rule is Section 149(3), which applies to the whole Board, not just the CSR Committee. Every company must have at least one director who has spent 182 days in India during the financial year. This can be difficult for companies controlled by NRI promoters because NRI status alone is not enough.

Practice Note

Being a Non-Resident Indian — an Indian citizen who happens to live abroad — does not, by itself, meet the Section 149(3) test. The requirement is physical presence in India for at least 182 days in the financial year, tracked cumulatively and not necessarily continuously. A company where every director, including Indian citizen NRI directors, spends fewer than 182 days physically in India in a given financial year is in default under Section 149(3), regardless of the directors' citizenship. Non-compliance attracts a general penalty under Section 172, a fine on the company, escalating with each day of continuing default up to a prescribed ceiling, and a separate fine on each officer in default.

In practice, companies controlled by NRI promoters handle this in one of two ways:

  • They either ensure at least one promoter or director spends enough time in India each year, tracking this with a travel register, or
  • They appoint a dedicated India-resident director. This director does not need to own shares or hold an executive role, but primarily meets the Section 149(3) requirement and serves as a local contact. If a company chooses this option, it often makes sense to include this person on the CSR Committee since they are based in India and can easily work with agencies, sign filings, and handle urgent compliance matters.

3.2 Approving CSR Policy Across Time Zones: The Video-Conferencing Framework

Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 originally restricted certain matters, including approval of annual financial statements, the Board's report, and matters relating to amalgamation, merger, or acquisition, from being dealt with solely through video conferencing, requiring physical quorum for these items. This restricted list, set out in Rule 4, was permanently removed effective 15 June 2021 (Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Amendment Rules, 2021, Notification No. G.S.R. 409(E)).

Practice Note

As matters currently stand, there is no restriction under the Companies Act, 2013 or the Rules made thereunder on conducting CSR Committee meetings, or on the Board's approval of the CSR policy and annual CSR expenditure, entirely through video conferencing — including where every participating director is outside India at the time. Physical presence of any director, or of any particular quorum, is not required for these matters. This materially simplifies governance for NRI-promoter-controlled companies, provided the video-conferencing procedure prescribed under Rule 3 of the 2014 Rules — including the roll call, confirmation of quorum, and secure recording of proceedings — is properly followed.

Even though the restriction is gone, scheduling meetings remains a challenge. India Standard Time is four and a half hours ahead of the UAE and two and a half hours behind Singapore. This creates a smaller window of overlapping business hours for all three locations compared to a Board based only in India.

IST UAE Time Singapore Time Suitability
9:30 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM Early for UAE participants
11:00 AM 9:30 AM 1:30 PM Workable window opens
2:00 PM 12:30 PM 4:30 PM Comfortable for all three locations
4:00 PM 2:30 PM 6:30 PM Workable window closes
6:00 PM 4:30 PM 8:30 PM Late for Singapore participants

A Board or CSR Committee with directors in India, the UAE, and Singapore has an overlapping meeting window of about 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM IST. It is practical to set this window in the company's annual meeting calendar from the start, instead of negotiating meeting times every time a CSR approval is needed.

3.3 CSR Expenditure and DTAA: What Is, and Is Not, in Scope

To be clear, an Indian company's own CSR spending does not involve any DTAA issues. A company incorporated in India is an Indian tax resident, no matter where its shareholders, promoters, or directors live or where it is managed. Its CSR spending comes from its own after-tax profits and is used for Schedule VII activities within India, either directly or through a CSR-1-registered Indian agency. This is a domestic transaction, so the DTAA does not apply.

The real cross-border questions are not about the CSR obligation itself but about related issues. These include how an NRI promoter's personal or company funds interact with Indian regulations and taxes when supporting India-focused philanthropy outside the company's required CSR spending, and how dividend repatriation planning affects the company's retained earnings and overall capital allocation, including CSR.

Within that wider framework, a further distinction arises. Where an NRI promoter wishes to contribute personally toward an Indian NGO or implementing agency — whether or not connected to the company's own CSR programme — the FCRA treatment turns on a distinction that is frequently overlooked.

When an NRI promoter personally contributes to an Indian NGO or implementing agency, whether or not linked to the company's CSR program, FCRA treatment depends on a key distinction. Contributions from an Indian citizen residing outside India, made from personal savings through normal banking channels, are not considered 'foreign contribution' under Section 2(1)(h) of FCRA, 2010, and do not require FCRA registration. This is confirmed by the Ministry of Home Affairs' FAQs on FCRA. Recipients should still obtain and retain passport details as proof of Indian citizenship.

Practice Note

This exemption does not extend to a contribution routed through an overseas corporate vehicle the NRI promoter owns or controls — a UAE free zone company or a Singapore Pte Ltd, for instance. Such an entity is itself a foreign company or corporation incorporated outside India, and a donation from it to an Indian recipient constitutes 'foreign contribution' from a 'foreign source' under Section 2(1)(j) of FCRA, 2010, regardless of the fact that its ultimate beneficial owner is an Indian citizen. Recipient NGOs and implementing agencies should be advised accordingly, and NRI promoters wishing to direct personal philanthropic contributions into India on an FCRA-neutral basis should generally do so from personal funds and accounts, not through an overseas holding entity, if they intend to avoid triggering the recipient's FCRA registration requirement. This is a separate compliance track entirely from the company's own Section 135 CSR spend, which raises no FCRA question at all.

3.3.2 Dividend Repatriation Planning and CSR Capital Allocation

Where NRI promoters draw returns from the Indian company primarily through dividends, the applicable DTAA caps the Indian withholding tax that would otherwise apply under the Income-tax Act, 2025. Under Article 10 of the India-UAE DTAA, India's withholding on dividends paid to a UAE-resident beneficial owner is capped at 10% of the gross dividend. Under the India-Singapore DTAA, the capped rate is 10% when the recipient is a company holding at least 25% of the shares in the Indian company, and 15% otherwise. In both cases, the promoter must hold a valid Tax Residency Certificate from the relevant jurisdiction and file the prescribed self-declaration in Form 41 under the Income-tax Act, 2025 (the successor to the earlier Form 10F) to access the treaty rate rather than the higher domestic withholding rate.

This is where CSR planning and dividend decisions overlap. When the Board decides how much profit to pay out as dividends versus how much to keep in the company, it affects the funds available for company operations, including any extra CSR spending above the required 2% or for multi-year CSR projects. The DTAA rate does not change the CSR obligation, which is set by Section 135(5) regardless of dividend policy. However, considering dividend policy and available capital together helps NRI promoters make better decisions, rather than treating them as separate issues.

3.4 Digital Signature and Practical Signing Logistics

CSR-related filings, such as Form CSR-1 certification, Form CSR-2, and Board resolutions filed with the Registrar, require a valid Class 3 Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) from the signing director. Companies with only or mostly NRI boards should plan extra time to issue and renew DSCs, as these steps often take longer for overseas applicants than for those in India. Missing or expired DSCs at filing deadlines can cause avoidable delays.

IV. Business Implications

4.1 For NRI Promoters and Boards

Making Section 149(3) residency tracking a regular compliance task, reviewed quarterly using a travel register, is important. It should not be assumed a director meets this requirement just because they have Indian citizenship. The most common gap in NRI-promoter-controlled companies is missing this step. Appointing a resident director to meet this rule is a simple, low-cost solution.

Risk

An NRI director's residence outside India does not reduce their exposure as an officer in default under Section 135(7) or Section 172 for CSR or governance non-compliance. Indian regulatory enforcement, including MCA adjudication proceedings, reaches directors regardless of where they are based, and overseas residence is not a practical or legal shield against personal penalty exposure.

4.2 For CSR Committee Scheduling

Including a realistic cross-time-zone meeting window in the company's annual governance calendar at the start of the financial year helps avoid delays in CSR policy approval or signing off on annual CSR spending. It also helps meet later deadlines, such as filing Form CSR-2. Discussing the annual dividend distribution together with the CSR budget, though governed by different rules, gives the Board a better understanding of the company's available capital for the year. This is especially useful when considering multi-year CSR project commitments.

4.4 For Recipients of NRI Promoter Philanthropy

Indian NGOs and implementing agencies working with an NRI promoter's personal philanthropy, separate from the company's CSR spending, should check at the start whether the contribution will come from the promoter's personal account or from an overseas company. This will determine if FCRA registration is needed to receive the funds.

V. Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways at a Glance

  1. An Indian company's CSR obligation under Section 135 is unaffected by the residency of its promoters or directors; NRI-promoter-controlled Indian companies are not subject to any special applicability or computation regime, unlike foreign companies operating through an Indian branch or project office.
  2. The CSR Committee for such a company follows the ordinary Rule 5 composition rules — there is no NRI-specific carve-out; the relevant residency requirement is Section 149(3)'s general mandate of at least one Board director present in India for 182 days in the financial year.
  3. NRI status alone does not satisfy Section 149(3) — physical presence in India for the prescribed period is required regardless of citizenship, and this is a common, avoidable compliance gap.
  4. Rule 4 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, which once restricted certain matters from video-conferencing approval, was permanently omitted with effect from 15 June 2021; CSR policy approval and CSR Committee business may now be conducted entirely through video conferencing.
  5. The Indian company's own CSR expenditure does not raise a DTAA question, since it is domestic expenditure by an Indian tax resident company; the genuine cross-border intersections lie in FCRA treatment of the promoter's personal versus corporate-vehicle contributions, and in dividend repatriation planning under the India-UAE (10% capped withholding) and India-Singapore (10%/15% capped withholding) DTAAs.
  6. A personal contribution by an NRI from personal savings through normal banking channels is not 'foreign contribution' under FCRA; the same contribution routed through an overseas corporate vehicle the NRI controls is foreign contribution from a foreign source, and triggers the recipient's FCRA registration requirement.
  7. DSC issuance and renewal for NRI directors typically takes longer than for India-resident directors and should be planned for accordingly, given the reliance on DSCs for CSR-1, CSR-2 and related statutory filings.

VI. Conclusion

For an NRI-promoter-controlled Indian company, the CSR obligation is straightforward. It follows the same Section 135 rules as any other Indian company, with the same 2% requirement. The real need for careful planning is in the company's governance: making sure the Board meets Section 149(3) without just assuming NRI status is enough, scheduling CSR Committee and Board approvals within a practical cross-time-zone window now that video-conferencing restrictions are gone, and clearly separating the company's own domestic CSR spending from FCRA and DTAA issues that only come up when the NRI promoter's personal or company funds cross borders.

Since these issues are often mixed up in practice, such as treating NRI status as the same as Board residency or thinking CSR spending has DTAA implications, NRI promoters and their advisors should handle governance, meeting planning, and cross-border capital planning together. They should also seek professional advice that fits their specific situation and group structure.

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, legal opinion, tax opinion or solicitation of professional work. Readers should consult their professional advisor before taking any action based on the contents of this article.

This article has been prepared in compliance with the ICAI Code of Ethics and applicable ICAI Advertisement Guidelines. © 2026 Sandeep Singla & Associates. All rights reserved.

Latest Blog

    Need Help?

    Want to discuss CSR Compliance for NRI Promoter-Controlled Indian Companies under the Companies Act, 2013? Reach out to our team for audit, tax, GST, and advisory help.

    Email: info@sspartners.in

    Gurgaon: E-127, Ground Floor, Sushant Shopping Arcade, Sushant Lok-1, Gurgaon - 122009, Haryana

    Delhi: V-8, Green Park Extension, New Delhi - 110016

    ← Back to Blog
    Back to top